BIRMINGHAM INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT - 1053 Words

BIRMINGHAM INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Introduction: Operations management is concerned with the design, planning, control and improvement of an organization’s resources and processes to produce goods or services for customers. Whether it is the provision of airport services, greetings cards, plastic buckets or holidays, operations managers will have been involved in the design, creation and delivery of those products or service each part of the airport – terminals, baggage handling services, aero plane servicing and catering, for example – has been carefully designed to fulfill not only its current role, but also with the possible demands of the next year and even the next 10 years in mind. Birmingham International Airport; is one of the†¦show more content†¦Operational planning is about making the operation as efficient as possible by working out how they can best allocate their infrastructure to the airlines. Question No.-4: Discuss the relationship between the day-to-day tasks and the long-term issues and explain how Richard manages to oversee both at the same time? Answer: Day-to-day jobs or activity is that one’s anyone does every day as a normal part of your life, your job etc. For example-The manager is responsible for the day-to-day running of the hotel. Besides, long-term issues mean any bond issue which having a maturity for long period like 13 months or more. For example-long-term investment etc. There is a relationship between day-to-day tasks and long-term issues. Day-to-day task is involved in long-term issues, because if regular basis of work does not do properly it creates a long-term issue. In an airport management has to maintain the day-to-day activities. For maintaining long-term issues day-to-day task should be done properly. From this case study we see that the Operation Director Richard manages to oversee both day-to-day tasks and long-term issues at the same time. They have appointed terminal managers whose duty is to look after the day-to-day operational problems and they cover the airport 24 hours a day of the week with one senior manager who

Peter Singer Sentience vs Self-Conciousness Essay

â€Å"Explain Singers distinction between sentience and self-consciousness, and what the distinction implies for the moral status of animals. Do you believe non-human animals have the same or a different moral status to human animals? Explain the basis of your answer.† More than three decades ago Peter Singer heralded the need for a new kind of liberation movement, one calling for a radical expansion of the human moral canvas and more importantly, a rejection of the horrors human beings have inflicted for millennia upon other sentient beings, treatment historically considered as being both natural and unalterable. Often regarded as being the father of the modern animal liberation movement, Singer contends that the campaign for animal†¦show more content†¦Birth and death therefore cancel each other out whereas the death of an animal with a desire for prolonged life means that their death inflicts a loss for which the birth of another does not wholly atone for. (1993, p. 126) This Singer refers to as the replacability argument which effectively seeks to draw a distinction between classes of sentient life forms. According to Singer, those animals which are not self-conscious are replaceable whilst those which are self-concious are not. If an animal is not self-concious then painlessly killing it and replacing it with an equally happy animal of the same species is considered to be morally permissible. However, if a human is self-concious then to painlessly kill one with a desire for continued existence and again replacing it with an equally happy human being would still be regarded as wrong. While practices such as factory farming are still regarded by Singer as being ethically indefensible, he concedes that there is no absolute moral requirement for humans to not eat meat so long as the animal â€Å"[has] a pleasant existence in a social group suited to their [behavioural] needs, and are then killed quickly and without pain.† (1990, p. 229-230) Singers strongest arguments for the equal consideration of animals

Essay On Smoking Example For Students

Essay On Smoking smoking: Smoking in public places should be illegal, and today, we theaffirmative team, will giveyou many reasons to prove why. People have been smoking cigarettes for hundreds of years, but it wasntuntilrecently that people started to realize exactly how bad cigarette smoking is. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-Category:Social IssuesPaper Title:smokingText:Smoking in public places should be illegal, and today, we the affirmativeteam, will giveyou many reasons to prove why. People have been smoking cigarettes for hundreds of years, but it wasntuntilrecently that people started to realize exactly how bad cigarette smoking is. It can have anumber of negative effects on the smoker, such as Lung Cancer, Emphysema,HeartDisease etcNot only can it have these effects on the smoker, but a personwho is simplybeing exposed to the smoke can contract the same illnesses, which hardlyseems fair. Smoking in public places is actually endangering peoples lives. Secondhand smoking is proven to cause lung cancer. Many reputable groups thathave inspected the evidence have reached the same conclusion, such as the USSurgeongenerals office, National Research Council, National institute ofoccupational safety andhealth, international agency for research on cancer, and the US occupationalsafety andhealth administration. Studies conducted show that people who breathesecondhandsmoke are 150% more likely to get lung cancer later. Exposure to second handsmokecauses about 47,000 deaths from heart disease and 3,000 lung cancer deaths,makingSecondhand Smoke the third leading cause of preventable death in the country. Not onlythat, but Secondhand smoke causes up to 300,000 cases of lower respiratorytractinfections such as bronchitis and pneumonia in infants and young children. These childrenand adults are totally innocent, and have made the choice to keep theirbodies healthy byNOT smoking, yet their results are just as bad, if not worse, then thesmokers! Americansshould have the right to be healthy if they so choose, and to do that, weneed to create asmoke-free environment in all public places. Cigarette smoke contains about 300 dangerous chemicals. In order to containthese chemicals to just the smoking sections, ventilation rates would have tobe increasedmore than a thousand-fold to reduce cancer risk. Even if we had the money todo that, itwould be impractical, because it would crease a virtual windstorm!Many places in the US already do ban smoking and the results have all beenpositive. 85% of the nations shopping malls are now smoke free. Princetonborough andtownship are doing things that hopefully many other towns and cities willfollowthey arethe first localities in the New York metropolitan region to outlaw smoking inalmost allpublic places, including bars and restaurants. The Law states that smokingshould beallowed only in private homes, outdoors and in the boroughs single smokeshop. This isexactly the kind of law we need throughout the United States. Many restaurants across the Nation have banned smoking and it has not hurtbusiness at all. Even smoke-free ordinances in North Carolina, the number onetobacco-producing state in the US, have brought on a positive effect. The vastmajority of studiesshown have proved the same thing. Studies in California and Arizona hadsimilar results. Massachusettss smoke free restaurants increased sales by 4%. In New YorkCity, eatingout has increased since the citys clean indoor air law took effect. The year2000 thetarget date to make all enclosed public areas smoke free. New York started bylimitingthe smoking sections in existing restaurants and making all new restaurantscompletelysmoke-free. In all my research, I only found one article on how clean indoorairregulations had a negative effect, and it turned out those places weregetting paid off bythe tobacco company!Not only does the new law not affect the restaurants and other public places,but itdoesnt affect the people negatively either! In a recent pole, 2.8 million ofthe 46 millionsmokers said theyd quit if there were a national ban. Fifty thousand otherswould decidenot to start each year the law is in effect! This may not sound like a lot,but it is. .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed , .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed .postImageUrl , .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed , .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed:hover , .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed:visited , .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed:active { border:0!important; } .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed:active , .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Jesse Ventura I Aint Got Time To Bleed EssayCigarette consumption would decline at least 10%, which is about 2.5 millionpacks ayear! Before, about one half of the non-smokers were avoiding certainrestaurants b/c ofthe smoke. Now, 17% of non-smokers eat out more, and are making up greatlyfor the33% of smokers who refuse to eat in these restaurants. This may seem like alot, but infact, it isnt! Only 30% of Americans smoke, so actually only 10% arenteating out b/c ofthe law, while about 30% more people are! In total, 86% of the Americanpopulation isnot only fine with the Clean Indoor Air

What the U.S should do in Afghanistan

Introduction Terrorism is certainly one of the greatest threats to international security, peace, and stability. It is one of the main challenges facing the international community since the end of Cold War, which threatened to plunge countries back to devastating warfare like First and Second World Wars. Consequently, the international community, led by the world’s dominant power, the USA, and its allies has staged a serious war against terrorism (Bergen and Gelb Para. 4).Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on What the U.S should do in Afghanistan specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The menace of terrorism has forced the U.S, and its allies, to step up the fight against terrorism by sending military expeditions and intelligence personnel to countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan. These countries are believed to be the operational bases from where terrorist groups like al-Qaeda and Taliban plan and execute their heinous acts. There has been an important and at the same time, an interesting debate, on what the U.S should do in Afghanistan after ten years of military action against Taliban and other terrorist outfits. While the US government appears to be convinced that appropriate time to leave Afghanistan has not come, some commentators, foreign policy experts, a considerable section of the media, and a considerable number of scholars propose that the U.S should leave Afghanistan now. Nevertheless, the US should continue with its mission in Afghanistan until such a time when it will be convinced that terrorist groups are not in control of Afghanistan and do not have chances of re-seizing power from civilians and a legitimate Afghan government in the future. What the U.S should do in Afghanistan The U.S and its allies are the main target of the madness of hatred perpetrated by terrorist groups such as Al Qaeda and Taliban. Unfortunately, more innocent and poor people have l ost their lives and thousands have been wounded severely as terrorists attack with an aim of killing Americans and citizens from its allied countries, especially the Britain. For example, during the 1998, Al Qaeda bombings in Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar el Salaam, Tanzania, at the American embassies in those two countries, hundreds of non-American Kenyan and Tanzanian citizens died and thousands incurred life-threatening injuries (Daily Nation Para.6). From a foreign policy point of view, as well as the need to maintain international peace and security, there are sound reasons that back the continued stay of the US and its allies’ military troops in Afghanistan. First, the Taliban insurgency, which is, essentially, a misogynist group of ignorant, chauvinistic, and intolerant gangsters if left unrestrained, will provide a safe ground from which al-Qaeda will plan to execute their wicked deeds against innocent, unarmed civilians especially the Americans (Bergen and Gelb Para.4).Adv ertising Looking for research paper on international relations? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Therefore, the Afghan War is a war that is worth fighting and important to protection of not only Americans and their properties, but also other people within the international community who easily get hurt by terrorists’ unjustified violent acts directed towards the US and its allies. Second, an unrestrained Taliban can now easily take over control of Afghanistan’s eastern and southern regions and possibly the entire country in the absence of the U.S and the international military forces. This line of argument is anchored on the fact that, the Afghan government and its ninety thousands-men army are very weak to withstand a serious rebellious challenge from Taliban’s fighters, a reality that is also acknowledged by some Afghan senior government officials. It is hard to win the fight against terrorism overnight. The Taliban outfit in Afghanistan, with the material support from anti-American elements in Pakistan, is strong and calls for plausible strategy to tackle. The ability of an enemy to fight back harder is not necessarily an indication that the important war against the menace of terrorism and anarchy in Afghanistan is unwinnable. In fact, it is safe to argue that, the U.S military forces and allies continued stay in the south East Asian region coupled with intensified intelligence has started to bear fruits in the war against terrorism. Following the victorious killing of al-Qaeda leader, Osama bin Laden, in one of the most magnificent manhunt story in contemporary history of humanity testifies of the fruits of the war against terrorism (Klein Para. 12). Thirdly, the available evidence shows that, Afghans, especially the unarmed peace-loving ones, favor the U.S military presence in their country. For example, an opinion poll conducted by the BBC in 2009 showed that, over sixty-three percent of Afghans favored the U.S military presence in Afghanistan. Therefore, the U.S should continue intensifying the fight against Taliban and Al-Qaeda while at the same time assisting the Afghan government and its army to strengthen itself in preparation for unavoidable future governance challenges. Afghanistan is in a turbulent transition period, which is accompanied by many socio-economic and political challenges that can be a serious impediment to peace in not only Afghanistan, but also in the whole of South East Asia and to a successful fight against terrorism. Abrupt departure of the US and international military forces would open up Afghanistan to the reappearance of renewed Taliban military campaigns. Most probably, the al-Qaeda would like to revenge by killing more Americans because of the premature death of their leader, Osama bin Laden, in early May this year.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on What the U.S should do in Afghanistan specifi cally for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The dialogue method is crucial in persuading the Taliban to end military campaigns and accept the constitution; nevertheless, the role of a competent and reliable third party in sealing of any possible peace deal, now and in future, cannot be underestimated. Right now, it is dangerous to give in to Taliban promises that an exit of the Western troops will make them end their unjustified military campaigns. Furthermore, entertaining the thought of sharing power with an illegal armed band that can hardly uphold any single article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is tantamount to throwing basic human rights of the poor innocent Afghans to dogs (Foley and Oates Para.16). Therefore, the U.S should continue with its mission to Afghanistan and even consider approving the 2009 proposal by President Obama’s administration to increase military troops in Afghanistan (Bergen and Gelb Para.15). In any ca se, Obama is concerned that he would be blamed in case of a terrorist attack following a quick withdrawal of the US military troops at this moment when all is clear that Al-Qaeda might revenge, the unceremonial death and burial of Osama, by killing more Americans (Bergen and Gelb Para.17). The US and her allies should then continue to watch vigilantly for any possible terrorist attacks while in Afghanistan while at the same time create an environment that is conducive to meaningful negotiations that involve relevant global actors like the United Nations among others (Atal Para.19). In short, the US and its allies should take more time to put in place any possible measures that can help Afghanistan people transit into a peaceful country capable of undertaking sustainable nation building processes without dangers of slipping back into anarchy through Taliban control. Given that a considerable percentage of Afghans, as indicated by recent news opinion polls, favor the US military prese nce in their country, it is arguable that the majority will not ready to tolerate ‘Stone Age’ governance styles of the Taliban any more (Foley and Oates Para.6).Advertising Looking for research paper on international relations? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The benefits won so far from the U.S and allies’ intervention in Afghanistan especially with regard to safeguarding rights of women and girls, should be safeguarded to the bitter end, regardless of the cost in terms of financial resources. The benefits are an indication that the war against Taliban, and by extension terrorism, is winnable. Currently, even though women and girls continue to languish in dehumanizing conditions, hundreds of thousands of women and girls are in school; therefore, there is hope for an even a brighter future for them. Their slow but sure emancipation from the largely patriarchal and unjust domination by men, under Taliban control, should be the beacon of hope that the fight against the Taliban is winnable in the near future (Foley and Oates Para.6). The US should, therefore, complete the work of assisting Afghans repossess their country from Taliban, and spearhead the fight against terrorism by destabilizing terrorist hideouts and safe havens in Sou th East Asian countries. The US must appreciate the fact that, they came to finish that fight irrespective of the unavoidable challenges that have come their way and will continue to emerge in the future. Conclusion In a recap, the US should continue with its mission of stumping out the Taliban from Afghanistan by putting in place measures that will minimize chances of Afghans slipping back to anarchy. The achievements realized so far, like assisting Afghans to elect a government and give the majority of women and girls their dignity and integrity, should be the beacon of the hope that the US and its allies will defeat Taliban and terrorism in the end. Works Cited Atal, Subodh. â€Å"At a Crossroads in Afghanistan: Should the United States Be Engaged in Nation Building?† CATO Institute, 2003. Web. Bergen, Peter, and Gelb, Leslie. â€Å"Two Arguments for What to Do in Afghanistan.† Time,  2009. Web. Daily Nation. Nairobi bomb blast mastermind is dead, 2011. Web. Foley , Conor, and Oates, Lauryn. â€Å"What should we do in Afghanistan?† The Guardian,  2008. Web. Klein, Kent. â€Å"Obama Announces Death of Osama bin Laden.† Voice of America, 2011. Web. This research paper on What the U.S should do in Afghanistan was written and submitted by user Josue Gallagher to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Global Warming Via Globalisation Essay Example

Global Warming Via Globalisation Paper This in turn promotes the usage of such chemicals. But the advantage is that goods services which help in preserving our world can also be introduced across the globe. For egg: non-polluting vehicles. This is the same for water pollution. Since all types’ goods and services are marketed globalization promotes the usage of goods that cause global warming and water pollution. Polluting water in turn creates water scarcity. Since the population is growing their needs will increase the production of such items at international level. Globalization will also promote the fuels and machines that cause less pollution. So buyers will be more for such items which will create a competition between industries to produce less polluting goods so that consumers would buy more. Globalization is often referred to when discussing things such as trade, travel or large international companies and people think that it has nothing to do with them. No matter where people live in the world, however, they can be affected by globalization on environment, an individual, local, national and global scale. Globalization and Environment Globalization is altering the global environment. Some perceive the net ecological impact of globalization as positive, as a force of progress and better lives. It fosters economic growth and cooperative institutions, both necessary in the long run to manage the global environment. Others see the net impact as negative, as a force sinking the globe into a bog of ecological decay. We will write a custom essay sample on Global Warming Via Globalisation specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Global Warming Via Globalisation specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Global Warming Via Globalisation specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer It is accelerating the destructive process of too many people consuming too many natural resources without any concern for equality or justice. Globalization involves multiple and complex sets of overlapping processes. Inevitably, there will be manifold and at times cross-cutting effects on the global environment. It is important to highlight that not only does globalization impact the environment, but the environment impacts the pace, direction and quality of globalization. At the very least, this happens because environmental resources provide the fuel for economic globalization, but also because our social and policy responses to global environmental challenges constrain and influence the context in which globalization happens. Global warming and Greenhouse effect After 1 50 Years of Industrialization, Climate Change is Inevitable. Global warming-also called climate change-refers to the worldwide rise in imperatives as the result of â€Å"greenhouse effect†. Greenhouse gases are released by activities such as the burning of fossil fuels, land clearing, and agriculture. 1 . How Do Humans Contribute to the Greenhouse Effect? While the greenhouse effect is an essential environmental prerequisite for life on Earth, there really can be too much of a good thing. The problems begin when human activities distort and accelerate the natural process by creating more greenhouse gases in the atmosphere than are necessary to warm the planet to an ideal temperature. Burning natural gas, coal and oil -including gasoline for automobile engines-raises the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Some farming practices and land-use changes increase the levels of methane and nitrous oxide. Many factories produce long-lasting industrial gases that do not occur naturally, yet contribute significantly to the enhanced greenhouse effect and â€Å"global warming’ that is currently under way. Deforestation also contributes to global warming. Trees use carbon dioxide and give off oxygen in its place, which helps to create the optimal balance of gases in the atmosphere. As more forests are logged for timber or UT down to make way for farming, however, there are fewer trees to perform this critical function. Population growth is another factor In global warming, because as more people use fossil fuels for heat, transportation and manufacturing the level of greenhouse gases continues to increase. As more farming occurs to feed millions of new people, more greenhouse gases enter the atmosphere. The relationship between globalization and the environment is too complex to sum up in a single judgment – whether â€Å"good† or â€Å"bad†. On the other hand, changes in the composition and techniques of economic activity can lower the damage relative to income. A sound environment is essential to realizing the full potential of globalization. Conversely, the absence of a sound environment can significantly undermine the promise of economic prosperity through globalization. Technological solutions will inevitably determine the future of globalization as well as the global environment. But they will do so within the context of global consumption demands. Technology cannot change the demands or help us satisfy all of them but it can, through globalization, help meet these demands in a more lancet-friendly way. Individuals Globalization affects every aspect of an individuals life including, religion, food, transport, language, music and clothing. It affects each individual differently however, depending on a diverse number of factors such as location, education and income. While globalization is said to unite the world, it has often been criticizes for widening the gap between the rich and poor. It also has been said to favor the wealthy and educated, particularly those citizens belonging to the wealthier countries such as the United States. People room developing nations are disadvantaged to an even greater extent than the poor from developed nations. Aside from being exploited as cheap labor, many are also without access to technology. For those who do have access, many are unable to use the internet owing to their inability to read and write, or to communicate in English which has become the dominant language in the new global world. People from poorer nations are said to also be exposed to more pollution. This pollution is suggested to have resulted from globalization which places importance on international travel and trade, as well as industry. Local On a local level, globalization has dramatically changed the nature of business. Many smaller, local companies have been pushed out of business by their competitors. It is Often a result of consumers turning to the cheaper retail prices which they can offer, owing to many having manufactured products using cheap foreign labor. In response, campaigns have been initiated to promote local markets being restored and the return of locally produced goods and services. The food industry is often referred to when making the point of just how much we import, how far it has to come and the impact that this is having on the environment. Increasing the local production of food would mean that less packaging and less transport would have a noticeable benefit to the environment. Local cultures have also been affected by globalization. Traditional customs and rituals are being replaced with the popular culture. Local communities are now likely to have fast food chains such as McDonald’s or restaurants with foreign dishes. National Globalization, which is often dominated by finance, economics and business, has naturally had a significant effect on a national level. While nations have restored from the wealth created by globalization, the circumstances of poor nations may have actually become worse. The problem is that for many poorer nations, the situation will continue to worsen. Their citizens are often less likely to be educated, or have the skills to assist in improving the economy of their country. For those who do have the education and skills, they are often granted visas to move to developed, wealthier nations for the chance of a better standard of living. While this improves their quality of life, their country is being left without the skilled workers that are needed to improve its economy. Global Globalization has resulted in almost every aspect of life existing on an increasingly international scale. A global economy is emerging owing to companies and countries expanding their international trade through improvements in technology. People are traveling to foreign countries more and cultures are being exchanged to form a shared global identity. The fact that humans all share the same global environment means that they are dependent on each other being able to protect it. The effects of globalization on the environment have come under heavy criticism in the past. It IS thought that globalization is a major contributor to global warming, due to its emphasis On international travel and trade, as well as industry. Statistics show that compared to 1950, emissions of carbon dioxide in 2000 had increased fourfold. In response, new policies have been adopted by countries to try to better protect the environment. How globalization causes global warming Around the world, this summer was different; Oil companies are relishing the prospect of getting at oil beneath the Arctic Ocean, as its ice cap melts more rapidly than anyone anticipated a few years ago. The inability to solve global warming, the most serious environmental problem facing the world, is emblematic of the failures of globalization. But it is also an opportunity to use the forces of globalization for the good of the planet’s health. We have become more interdependent, and greater interdependence increases the need for acting together. But we do not have the institutional frameworks for doing this effectively and democratically. There has been much discussion of how we can make our global economy work more smoothly, but if we do not learn how to share our planet better. What happens if you release carbon dioxide and certain other gases into the atmosphere in larger amounts? The gases act like a greenhouse, capturing solar energy in the atmosphere, and gradually the Earth warms up. Ocean currents are altered, ocean levels rise, rainfall patterns change, and storms become more intense. We need an enforcement mechanism to prevent the countries that refuses to cut back emissions from inflicting harm on the rest of the world. Globalization has its costs, but it also has its benefits, and among those is an international trade framework that can be used to enforce emission reductions. Not paying the full costs Of production, not paying the cost Of damage to the environment, is itself a subsidy, just as not paying the full costs of workers would be. In most developed countries today, firms are paying the cost of pollution to the global environment, in the form of taxes imposed on coal, oil and gas. The nations go along unless developing countries reduce their emissions, and the developing countries see no reason they should not be allowed to pollute as much per capita. There is a way out, and that is through a common (global) environmental tax on emissions. There is a social cost to emissions, and the common environmental tax would simply make everyone pay the social cost. This is in accord with the most basic of economic principles, that individuals and firms should pay their full costs. Now that pollution rights are treatable, we can even put a market value on them, and it is enormous. Each country claims special circumstances that warrant a larger allocation of emission rights. But under the common tax approach, these debates are sidestepped. All that is asked is that everyone pay the social cost of their emissions. The challenges the world confronts in popping with global warming parallel those in the other arenas of globalization: an unfair global trade regime that impedes development, an unstable global financial system that results in crisis after crisis, with poor countries repeatedly finding themselves with debt burdens beyond their ability to pay, and a global intellectual property regime which denies access to affordable lifesaving drugs, even as the AIDS epidemic ravishes so much of the developing world. Money should flow from the rich to the poor countries, but in recent years, it has been going in the opposite direction. Because the rich re better able to bear the risk of exchange and interest rate fluctuations, the rich should bear the brunt of this volatility, but instead it is borne by the poor. Resource rich countries have done more poorly than those who are far worse off. Conclusion It is a conceptual study about our environment. The globe is getting much warmer nowadays. There are so many causes for this global warming. Globalization is one of the causes of this. By this analysis, I conclude that; Global warming is the rise in the average temperature of earth’s atmosphere and oceans. Globalization is the process of extending social elation’s across world space. Such extension results in simultaneous development in technology and trade. Some of them cause harm to the atmosphere and invites global warming. The increase in the earth’s average surface temperature due to the effect of green house gases such as carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels etc leads to global warming. As a part of globalization the invention of new technologies has created much smoke and dust which does harm to the nature. The two terms globalization and global warming are closely related. What globalization does to the atmosphere is global warming even though it brings in development. Globalization can be changed; indeed, it is clear that it will be changed. The question is: Will change be forced upon us, a result of a crisis, or will we take control of the process. The former risks a backlash against globalization or a hazard reshaping, in a way that only sets the stage for even more problems in the future. The latter holds out the possibility of remaking globalization so that it at last lives up to its potential of improving the living standards of everyone in the world, and as an added benefit helping to save the atmosphere that makes life on Earth possible.

Data Protection among Employees Essay Example

Data Protection among Employees Essay Example Data Protection among Employees Essay Data Protection among Employees Essay P5, P6 AND M2 An employee working within the HR department at Dominos became frustrated when she found out that men working within the organisation were being paid more than women who were working in the same role. She decided that the best way to deal with this situation was to email all staff within the organisation and send documents proving her findings. These documents contained sensitive employee information (personal details: address, bank account and salary etc.), all staff were outraged, and the employee was dismissed immediately. The implications of the employee’s actions span across legal, ethical and operational issues in relation to the use of business information. LEGAL ISSUES Legislation (law) is outlined by the government and businesses need to enforce this when handling information. There are various amounts of legislations that protect, pertain to and manage business information. An example would be the Data Protection Act (1996). The Data Protection Act 1998 protects the information held about people from being misused. Another would be the similar and newer regulation The General Data Protection Regulation. There are 8 major principles of the Data Protection Act, these principles require that personal information is: 1. Processed fairly and lawfully 2. Processed for one or more specified and lawful purposes, and not further processed in any way that is incompatible with the original purpose 3. Adequate, relevant and not excessive 4. Accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date 5. Kept for no longer than is necessary for the purpose for which it is being used 6. Processed in line with the rights of individuals 7. Kept secure with appropriate technical and organisational measures taken to protect the information 8. Not transferred outside the European Economic Area (the European Union member states plus Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein) unless there is adequate protection for the personal information being transferred The General Data Protection Regulation (2018) comes into effect on 25 May 2018. The GDPR builds on existing data protection law to strengthen the protection of individuals personal data. Personal data a business might hold includes: Employee records Customer databases There are stricter rules for sensitive personal data: Sensitive data continues to include information on racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious beliefs, trade union membership, health, and information on sex life or sexual orientation. Genetic or biometric data are also sensitive data. Dominos must follow this act and make sure that all obtained customer and staff information is secure, relevant and accurate. At Dominos they collect â€Å"personal information such as your name, address, telephone number and email address as provided by you when you register to My Domino’s or place an order with us† . The employee broke the Data Protection and General Data Act by disclosing sensitive employee information such as financial and personal details to other staff. This is puts staff at risk of fraud and other financial crimes. In this case Dominos have failed, they have failed to maintain the Data Protection and GDPR and have allowed an employee to leak sensitive employee information this can have several major implications on the business staff morale and cohesion as inter-staff trust is likely to be weakened after this event, which can likely take a toll on business performance and therefore sales. Most important employees have now lost trust in the busine ss, it was Dominos job to keep their information safe and yet it got disclosed and spread in a public manner despite the woman’s perceived good will. In order to make employees feel safe and to prevent something similar from happening again, Dominos must implement new organisational policies pertaining to the protection and security increase of employee information. The Freedom of Information Act (2000) allows any individual or business to request information held by a public authority. E.g. Nottingham City Council and Nottingham County Council. In Domino’s privacy policy it outlines the fact that all customers â€Å"have a right to request access to or rectification of your personal data which we hold about you. You also have a right to erase your personal data, to restrict the processing of your personal data and the right to receive your personal data that you have provided to us and to transit such personal data to another data controller†. It was in the employee’s rights to request pay information of both male and female workers within the business but she The Computer Misuse Act (1990) Businesses have to ensure they protect business information. The act splits into three different sections and makes the following illegal: Unauthorised access to computer material Unauthorised access to computer systems with intent to commit another defence Unauthorised modification of computer material ETHICAL ISSUES Ethical issues refer to the codes of practice that exist in businesses to maintain ‘moral principles concerning acceptable and unacceptable behaviour by businesses’. They maintain these ethics on: Use of Email Whistle-Blowing Organisational Policies Information Ownership All businesses have codes of conduct on the correct use of email within the business. These codes often refer to how much and what you can send on email. Examples of expected emails would be: To send business information to staff To send a memo To send a notice of business meetings To distribute news To share basic information to a large group of people Examples of email against most email codes of conduct would be: Personal emails Large amounts of information/documents, to a large number of people Inappropriate content Personal Conversations Sending Confidential materials Dominos doesn’t not have open evidence of internal email codes of conduct however, in order to run the business as smoothly as possible they more than likely use a number of the aforementioned rules. The employee definitely broke these rules by sending confidential materials to the whole Dominos does have codes of conduct pertaining to the customer, they make sure to let customers know that they can unsubscribe from receive promotional materials from Domino’s via email.

Write a report on the UK Government Green Policies and its Essay

Write a report on the UK Government Green Policies and its implications both positive and negative on enterprise based in the UK - Essay Example People all across the globe are very worried about the problems. Slicing carbon emission has been identified as one of the prime issues for increasing pollution. In the month of March in the year of 2010, Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) published a plan which is related with the climate change. This plan defines about DEFRA’s policy to reduce emission of greenhouse gas and also address the opportunities and risk associated with present climate change (DEFRA, n.d.). The government of the United Kingdom supported the Green Grid which is a non-profit making organization working in whole world for the boost of IT energy efficiency. Department of Energy (DOE) of US is grouping with Green Grid to the advance efficiency of energy in IT world (Mellor, 2007). The EU code of conduct is developed for the greener datacenters. UK Chief of Information Office Council has been summoned for reducing the footprint of carbon in government computers and also to improve the efficiency of IT in public sector by Gillian Merron, the Cabinet Minister. The UK government brings new plan in order to control the climate change. This plan sets the belief of the government that stumpy carbon transformation will be the most important drivers of growth of economy and also creation of job – in UK and globally (Pindyk, n.d.). On 31st March of 2010, DECC has opened a collaborative consultation document with Department for Business, Innovation and Skills about the stumpy carbon skills. The government has also started to tackle the problem. This is true that humans commit the wrong things for the environment like polluting lakes and rivers, discharging sulfur dioxide in the air and also releasing chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) that causes ozone depletion. So, the government restrictions and intervention of taxes on the emission, prevents this kind destructive