BIRMINGHAM INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT - 1053 Words

BIRMINGHAM INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Introduction: Operations management is concerned with the design, planning, control and improvement of an organization’s resources and processes to produce goods or services for customers. Whether it is the provision of airport services, greetings cards, plastic buckets or holidays, operations managers will have been involved in the design, creation and delivery of those products or service each part of the airport – terminals, baggage handling services, aero plane servicing and catering, for example – has been carefully designed to fulfill not only its current role, but also with the possible demands of the next year and even the next 10 years in mind. Birmingham International Airport; is one of the†¦show more content†¦Operational planning is about making the operation as efficient as possible by working out how they can best allocate their infrastructure to the airlines. Question No.-4: Discuss the relationship between the day-to-day tasks and the long-term issues and explain how Richard manages to oversee both at the same time? Answer: Day-to-day jobs or activity is that one’s anyone does every day as a normal part of your life, your job etc. For example-The manager is responsible for the day-to-day running of the hotel. Besides, long-term issues mean any bond issue which having a maturity for long period like 13 months or more. For example-long-term investment etc. There is a relationship between day-to-day tasks and long-term issues. Day-to-day task is involved in long-term issues, because if regular basis of work does not do properly it creates a long-term issue. In an airport management has to maintain the day-to-day activities. For maintaining long-term issues day-to-day task should be done properly. From this case study we see that the Operation Director Richard manages to oversee both day-to-day tasks and long-term issues at the same time. They have appointed terminal managers whose duty is to look after the day-to-day operational problems and they cover the airport 24 hours a day of the week with one senior manager who

Peter Singer Sentience vs Self-Conciousness Essay

â€Å"Explain Singers distinction between sentience and self-consciousness, and what the distinction implies for the moral status of animals. Do you believe non-human animals have the same or a different moral status to human animals? Explain the basis of your answer.† More than three decades ago Peter Singer heralded the need for a new kind of liberation movement, one calling for a radical expansion of the human moral canvas and more importantly, a rejection of the horrors human beings have inflicted for millennia upon other sentient beings, treatment historically considered as being both natural and unalterable. Often regarded as being the father of the modern animal liberation movement, Singer contends that the campaign for animal†¦show more content†¦Birth and death therefore cancel each other out whereas the death of an animal with a desire for prolonged life means that their death inflicts a loss for which the birth of another does not wholly atone for. (1993, p. 126) This Singer refers to as the replacability argument which effectively seeks to draw a distinction between classes of sentient life forms. According to Singer, those animals which are not self-conscious are replaceable whilst those which are self-concious are not. If an animal is not self-concious then painlessly killing it and replacing it with an equally happy animal of the same species is considered to be morally permissible. However, if a human is self-concious then to painlessly kill one with a desire for continued existence and again replacing it with an equally happy human being would still be regarded as wrong. While practices such as factory farming are still regarded by Singer as being ethically indefensible, he concedes that there is no absolute moral requirement for humans to not eat meat so long as the animal â€Å"[has] a pleasant existence in a social group suited to their [behavioural] needs, and are then killed quickly and without pain.† (1990, p. 229-230) Singers strongest arguments for the equal consideration of animals

Essay On Smoking Example For Students

Essay On Smoking smoking: Smoking in public places should be illegal, and today, we theaffirmative team, will giveyou many reasons to prove why. People have been smoking cigarettes for hundreds of years, but it wasntuntilrecently that people started to realize exactly how bad cigarette smoking is. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-Category:Social IssuesPaper Title:smokingText:Smoking in public places should be illegal, and today, we the affirmativeteam, will giveyou many reasons to prove why. People have been smoking cigarettes for hundreds of years, but it wasntuntilrecently that people started to realize exactly how bad cigarette smoking is. It can have anumber of negative effects on the smoker, such as Lung Cancer, Emphysema,HeartDisease etcNot only can it have these effects on the smoker, but a personwho is simplybeing exposed to the smoke can contract the same illnesses, which hardlyseems fair. Smoking in public places is actually endangering peoples lives. Secondhand smoking is proven to cause lung cancer. Many reputable groups thathave inspected the evidence have reached the same conclusion, such as the USSurgeongenerals office, National Research Council, National institute ofoccupational safety andhealth, international agency for research on cancer, and the US occupationalsafety andhealth administration. Studies conducted show that people who breathesecondhandsmoke are 150% more likely to get lung cancer later. Exposure to second handsmokecauses about 47,000 deaths from heart disease and 3,000 lung cancer deaths,makingSecondhand Smoke the third leading cause of preventable death in the country. Not onlythat, but Secondhand smoke causes up to 300,000 cases of lower respiratorytractinfections such as bronchitis and pneumonia in infants and young children. These childrenand adults are totally innocent, and have made the choice to keep theirbodies healthy byNOT smoking, yet their results are just as bad, if not worse, then thesmokers! Americansshould have the right to be healthy if they so choose, and to do that, weneed to create asmoke-free environment in all public places. Cigarette smoke contains about 300 dangerous chemicals. In order to containthese chemicals to just the smoking sections, ventilation rates would have tobe increasedmore than a thousand-fold to reduce cancer risk. Even if we had the money todo that, itwould be impractical, because it would crease a virtual windstorm!Many places in the US already do ban smoking and the results have all beenpositive. 85% of the nations shopping malls are now smoke free. Princetonborough andtownship are doing things that hopefully many other towns and cities willfollowthey arethe first localities in the New York metropolitan region to outlaw smoking inalmost allpublic places, including bars and restaurants. The Law states that smokingshould beallowed only in private homes, outdoors and in the boroughs single smokeshop. This isexactly the kind of law we need throughout the United States. Many restaurants across the Nation have banned smoking and it has not hurtbusiness at all. Even smoke-free ordinances in North Carolina, the number onetobacco-producing state in the US, have brought on a positive effect. The vastmajority of studiesshown have proved the same thing. Studies in California and Arizona hadsimilar results. Massachusettss smoke free restaurants increased sales by 4%. In New YorkCity, eatingout has increased since the citys clean indoor air law took effect. The year2000 thetarget date to make all enclosed public areas smoke free. New York started bylimitingthe smoking sections in existing restaurants and making all new restaurantscompletelysmoke-free. In all my research, I only found one article on how clean indoorairregulations had a negative effect, and it turned out those places weregetting paid off bythe tobacco company!Not only does the new law not affect the restaurants and other public places,but itdoesnt affect the people negatively either! In a recent pole, 2.8 million ofthe 46 millionsmokers said theyd quit if there were a national ban. Fifty thousand otherswould decidenot to start each year the law is in effect! This may not sound like a lot,but it is. .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed , .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed .postImageUrl , .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed , .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed:hover , .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed:visited , .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed:active { border:0!important; } .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed:active , .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u0e61a324b5d585ab26b008f6d34346ed:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Jesse Ventura I Aint Got Time To Bleed EssayCigarette consumption would decline at least 10%, which is about 2.5 millionpacks ayear! Before, about one half of the non-smokers were avoiding certainrestaurants b/c ofthe smoke. Now, 17% of non-smokers eat out more, and are making up greatlyfor the33% of smokers who refuse to eat in these restaurants. This may seem like alot, but infact, it isnt! Only 30% of Americans smoke, so actually only 10% arenteating out b/c ofthe law, while about 30% more people are! In total, 86% of the Americanpopulation isnot only fine with the Clean Indoor Air

What the U.S should do in Afghanistan

Introduction Terrorism is certainly one of the greatest threats to international security, peace, and stability. It is one of the main challenges facing the international community since the end of Cold War, which threatened to plunge countries back to devastating warfare like First and Second World Wars. Consequently, the international community, led by the world’s dominant power, the USA, and its allies has staged a serious war against terrorism (Bergen and Gelb Para. 4).Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on What the U.S should do in Afghanistan specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The menace of terrorism has forced the U.S, and its allies, to step up the fight against terrorism by sending military expeditions and intelligence personnel to countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan. These countries are believed to be the operational bases from where terrorist groups like al-Qaeda and Taliban plan and execute their heinous acts. There has been an important and at the same time, an interesting debate, on what the U.S should do in Afghanistan after ten years of military action against Taliban and other terrorist outfits. While the US government appears to be convinced that appropriate time to leave Afghanistan has not come, some commentators, foreign policy experts, a considerable section of the media, and a considerable number of scholars propose that the U.S should leave Afghanistan now. Nevertheless, the US should continue with its mission in Afghanistan until such a time when it will be convinced that terrorist groups are not in control of Afghanistan and do not have chances of re-seizing power from civilians and a legitimate Afghan government in the future. What the U.S should do in Afghanistan The U.S and its allies are the main target of the madness of hatred perpetrated by terrorist groups such as Al Qaeda and Taliban. Unfortunately, more innocent and poor people have l ost their lives and thousands have been wounded severely as terrorists attack with an aim of killing Americans and citizens from its allied countries, especially the Britain. For example, during the 1998, Al Qaeda bombings in Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar el Salaam, Tanzania, at the American embassies in those two countries, hundreds of non-American Kenyan and Tanzanian citizens died and thousands incurred life-threatening injuries (Daily Nation Para.6). From a foreign policy point of view, as well as the need to maintain international peace and security, there are sound reasons that back the continued stay of the US and its allies’ military troops in Afghanistan. First, the Taliban insurgency, which is, essentially, a misogynist group of ignorant, chauvinistic, and intolerant gangsters if left unrestrained, will provide a safe ground from which al-Qaeda will plan to execute their wicked deeds against innocent, unarmed civilians especially the Americans (Bergen and Gelb Para.4).Adv ertising Looking for research paper on international relations? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Therefore, the Afghan War is a war that is worth fighting and important to protection of not only Americans and their properties, but also other people within the international community who easily get hurt by terrorists’ unjustified violent acts directed towards the US and its allies. Second, an unrestrained Taliban can now easily take over control of Afghanistan’s eastern and southern regions and possibly the entire country in the absence of the U.S and the international military forces. This line of argument is anchored on the fact that, the Afghan government and its ninety thousands-men army are very weak to withstand a serious rebellious challenge from Taliban’s fighters, a reality that is also acknowledged by some Afghan senior government officials. It is hard to win the fight against terrorism overnight. The Taliban outfit in Afghanistan, with the material support from anti-American elements in Pakistan, is strong and calls for plausible strategy to tackle. The ability of an enemy to fight back harder is not necessarily an indication that the important war against the menace of terrorism and anarchy in Afghanistan is unwinnable. In fact, it is safe to argue that, the U.S military forces and allies continued stay in the south East Asian region coupled with intensified intelligence has started to bear fruits in the war against terrorism. Following the victorious killing of al-Qaeda leader, Osama bin Laden, in one of the most magnificent manhunt story in contemporary history of humanity testifies of the fruits of the war against terrorism (Klein Para. 12). Thirdly, the available evidence shows that, Afghans, especially the unarmed peace-loving ones, favor the U.S military presence in their country. For example, an opinion poll conducted by the BBC in 2009 showed that, over sixty-three percent of Afghans favored the U.S military presence in Afghanistan. Therefore, the U.S should continue intensifying the fight against Taliban and Al-Qaeda while at the same time assisting the Afghan government and its army to strengthen itself in preparation for unavoidable future governance challenges. Afghanistan is in a turbulent transition period, which is accompanied by many socio-economic and political challenges that can be a serious impediment to peace in not only Afghanistan, but also in the whole of South East Asia and to a successful fight against terrorism. Abrupt departure of the US and international military forces would open up Afghanistan to the reappearance of renewed Taliban military campaigns. Most probably, the al-Qaeda would like to revenge by killing more Americans because of the premature death of their leader, Osama bin Laden, in early May this year.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on What the U.S should do in Afghanistan specifi cally for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The dialogue method is crucial in persuading the Taliban to end military campaigns and accept the constitution; nevertheless, the role of a competent and reliable third party in sealing of any possible peace deal, now and in future, cannot be underestimated. Right now, it is dangerous to give in to Taliban promises that an exit of the Western troops will make them end their unjustified military campaigns. Furthermore, entertaining the thought of sharing power with an illegal armed band that can hardly uphold any single article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is tantamount to throwing basic human rights of the poor innocent Afghans to dogs (Foley and Oates Para.16). Therefore, the U.S should continue with its mission to Afghanistan and even consider approving the 2009 proposal by President Obama’s administration to increase military troops in Afghanistan (Bergen and Gelb Para.15). In any ca se, Obama is concerned that he would be blamed in case of a terrorist attack following a quick withdrawal of the US military troops at this moment when all is clear that Al-Qaeda might revenge, the unceremonial death and burial of Osama, by killing more Americans (Bergen and Gelb Para.17). The US and her allies should then continue to watch vigilantly for any possible terrorist attacks while in Afghanistan while at the same time create an environment that is conducive to meaningful negotiations that involve relevant global actors like the United Nations among others (Atal Para.19). In short, the US and its allies should take more time to put in place any possible measures that can help Afghanistan people transit into a peaceful country capable of undertaking sustainable nation building processes without dangers of slipping back into anarchy through Taliban control. Given that a considerable percentage of Afghans, as indicated by recent news opinion polls, favor the US military prese nce in their country, it is arguable that the majority will not ready to tolerate ‘Stone Age’ governance styles of the Taliban any more (Foley and Oates Para.6).Advertising Looking for research paper on international relations? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The benefits won so far from the U.S and allies’ intervention in Afghanistan especially with regard to safeguarding rights of women and girls, should be safeguarded to the bitter end, regardless of the cost in terms of financial resources. The benefits are an indication that the war against Taliban, and by extension terrorism, is winnable. Currently, even though women and girls continue to languish in dehumanizing conditions, hundreds of thousands of women and girls are in school; therefore, there is hope for an even a brighter future for them. Their slow but sure emancipation from the largely patriarchal and unjust domination by men, under Taliban control, should be the beacon of hope that the fight against the Taliban is winnable in the near future (Foley and Oates Para.6). The US should, therefore, complete the work of assisting Afghans repossess their country from Taliban, and spearhead the fight against terrorism by destabilizing terrorist hideouts and safe havens in Sou th East Asian countries. The US must appreciate the fact that, they came to finish that fight irrespective of the unavoidable challenges that have come their way and will continue to emerge in the future. Conclusion In a recap, the US should continue with its mission of stumping out the Taliban from Afghanistan by putting in place measures that will minimize chances of Afghans slipping back to anarchy. The achievements realized so far, like assisting Afghans to elect a government and give the majority of women and girls their dignity and integrity, should be the beacon of the hope that the US and its allies will defeat Taliban and terrorism in the end. Works Cited Atal, Subodh. â€Å"At a Crossroads in Afghanistan: Should the United States Be Engaged in Nation Building?† CATO Institute, 2003. Web. Bergen, Peter, and Gelb, Leslie. â€Å"Two Arguments for What to Do in Afghanistan.† Time,  2009. Web. Daily Nation. Nairobi bomb blast mastermind is dead, 2011. Web. Foley , Conor, and Oates, Lauryn. â€Å"What should we do in Afghanistan?† The Guardian,  2008. Web. Klein, Kent. â€Å"Obama Announces Death of Osama bin Laden.† Voice of America, 2011. Web. This research paper on What the U.S should do in Afghanistan was written and submitted by user Josue Gallagher to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.